Alright people games up, everybody post your pictures on Facebook and let the public decide! Could this be a case for Photoshop forensics?
Ooooh gossip! So while I was busy busting copycat covers a whole other kettle of fish was brewing behind the scenes. Get this; Madame Singham aka Kajal Agarwal told the media that she never even posed for that picture! What now? Yup, she claims that the picture was distorted, she never posed topless and was wearing a black tube the whole time. (Also Kajal denies saying she would never wear a bikini or do a kissing scene in the interview.) Hahaha oh so that’s what she’s worried about, that nobody will cast her pristine ass. *Lol*
Meanwhile the editor of FHM Kabeer Sharma is understandably fuming! He says, “We shot with Madam Agarwal on the 18th of August in Mumbai and have a full team composed of assistants, stylists, make up artists, photographers and others to back it up. We’d be happy to release the full untouched raw pictures on the internet soon to back it up also.” Oooh snap. “Furthermore we also have a model release form signed by Kajal herself. We don’t know what exactly made Kajal change her mind after the shoot… but if she did, the magazine really cannot be blamed.”
Who really knows what happened here but I’m leaning towards Kabeer’s version. I mean FHM is a pretty legit mag (with some serious cover girls in their repertoire), and if they were planning to Photoshop someone topless why on earth would they pick Kajal Agarwal?
By the by Kabeer, if you’re looking for a less controversial cover girl (who’ll probably even drop trou!), might I suggest Poonam Pandey? Just tell her it’s for the cricket special :) xoxo